NotaBene Mailing List 2002
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Safeworld as an alternative to this list
- To: Nota Bene List <notabene>
- Subject: Safeworld as an alternative to this list
- From: Mary Bernard <Mary_Bernard>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 18:53:53 +0000
Speaking as one who spends more time answering NB list questions than
asking them (though I well remember the days when the reverse was true),
I've got real doubts about the value of a chat site as a way of learning
much about NB in general and XPL in particular.
When I answer a question, I usually open NB, and spend a bit of time
hunting through the menus, or through my keyboard table, or through Help,
to check that the info I give is accurate; and quite often I test my advice
on a temp file. That all takes time, sometimes quite a bit of time, and I
don't want to spend that kind of time online, for the financial reasons I
outlined the other day.
Also, I find the chat format peculiarly irritating - sending, and then
having to wait and wait and wait for a reply. I'm a v. impatient person,
and twiddling my thumbs is my idea of how to have a bad time.
Also, Louis has done a beautiful job of breaking possible NB topics into
categories - Lingua, Styles, etc. But I'm not sure whether such subdivision
is in the long term to everyone's benefit. I, who don't use Styles, might
never click on that category. But we all know how threads drift. I might
miss something useful - or might miss being able to contribute something
useful. The good thing about receiving list email is that I can glance at
the header and also at the message in the preview pane. If the header says
Styles, but the message has drifted to being about keyboard files (not
impossible!), then I'll read it. Tucked away in a subheading of the
Safeworld world, I might never see it.
Finally, as to XPL. I've said I'll give a class (!) in it, and I shall, but
an hour on a chat line isn't going to get us very far, unless people have
done a bit of boning up in advance. XPL is in the end something you learn
on your own, by reading the manual (the CPG) and trying out the examples.
It has rules, and a vocabulary: not for nothing is it called a programming
*language*. It's rewarding, even at the simplest level; it's lots of fun
to learn, esp. if you like structured thinking and puzzle solving; and it's
incredibly useful. But it really does take application.
I don't think I'm just being Luddite about the chat format. The value of
the list, it seems to me, is that the format gives time for considered
responses, which are surely what people want?
Mary
Mary Bernard
mary_bernard
Main Index |
Thread Index