Re: Difference?

[cleaner1@juno.com (david c winters)]

ONE THING REALLY SUCKS- is you cannot make true DOS apps using C++
Builder. I wanted to write a program last time that was a TRUE 16 bit DOS
app that wrote and read from the registry. Fat chance on that one- but I
ponder on how other companies do this... I know it can be done....

Chris Winters
www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Pines/5299
cleaner1@juno.com or wintersrus@prodigy.net (binary xfers)
Get Master Control Panel TODAY at the web site above!
Customize Windows- Do things quicker!

On Wed, 30 Sep 1998 12:33:55 -0500 (CDT) Daniel Hallmark <dgh@scott.net>
writes:
>On Wed, 30 Sep 1998, Bidyut wrote:
>
>> What is the difference between BCB & BCB3? If BCB3 is really good I 
>plan
>> to buy myself one.
>>     And one more thing is BC5 is obselute form now onwards?
>>     Is Visual C++ quite similar to BCB?
>
>
>BC5 is still useful for compiling legacy code that probably will never 
>be 
>ported to CBuilder.  You can also use BC5 to build 16-bit applications 
>
>for windows/dos which you cannot do with CBuilder.
>
>>From what I've seen of VC++ it is much more like BC5 than Cbuilder.  
>It 
>is not a RAD tool.  The two biggest enhancements that I've seen 
>personally from upgrading to BCB3 are the much better set of internet 
>components, and a better version of the RW STL.
>
>Daniel Hallmark
>
>

___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]