CPB Mailing List
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[B1] destructor bug
Is it customary to post relevant bugs known to Borland
on this list and has anyone posted this one before? I noticed it
in this month's Windows Developer's (why not Developers'?)
Journal this month. It relates to a problem with Borland's
destruction of temporary objects. Their example has a function's
static object requiring two other temporaries. The article says
the bug applies to BC++ 5.02 and CPPB 1.0, but not CPPB 3.0.
ftp://ftp.mfi.com/pub/windev/webzip/0904/nelson.zip
Sorry if this post is not appropriate.
Royce
W Komornicki's Home Page |
Main Index |
Thread Index