CPB Mailing List

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: should I buy C++ Builder 3.0 ?

To: <cpb-thread@zdtips.com>
Subject: Re: should I buy C++ Builder 3.0 ?
From: "David A. Beisel" <dbeisel@ibm.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 08:19:03 -0700
Reply-To: cpb-thread@zdtips.com
Sender: owner-cpb-thread@zdtips.com


>Builder 3 is also the only C++ compiler from Borland. C++ 5.x is
>upgraded to Builder 3.
>

I compile DOS 16-bit and Windows Builder Apps and have both
BC 5.02 and BCB 1.0.  Will BCB 3.0 compile 16-bit DOS programs?
If so, does it solve the bug with 5.02 where it doesn't link overlays?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: should I buy C++ Builder 3.0 ?
  - From: Clifton Mayo <cmayo@ti.com>
- Re: should I buy C++ Builder 3.0 ?
  - From: "Michael Trier" <michael@safetystorage.com>

References:
- Re: should I buy C++ Builder 3.0 ?
  - From: Jan Piessens <janp@innet.be>

Prev by Date: Re: Database Path
Next by Date: [BCB1] Problem installing TAdvStringGrids
Prev by thread: Re: should I buy C++ Builder 3.0 ?
Next by thread: Re: should I buy C++ Builder 3.0 ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

W Komornicki's Home Page | Main Index | Thread Index