« Los Angeles flaming after gay cowboy riots | Main | Ladies night proves to be drunken Myth »

March 28, 2006

Whiteboard sketch lacks passion, proportions, professionalism

The rhetOracle is a mock issue of Hamline's undergraduate newspaper, the Oracle. We are trying to be as derisive as possible. Please enjoy the farcical nature of this issue or at least, ignore us.

Existential Pundit

Students in the English department’s “Cartooning for Careers” class were mildly amused yet highly critical of a slipshod whiteboard rendition found in GLC 115. Professor Kristin Mapel-Bloomberg was the first to sight the piece, immediately interpreting the kneeling figure as subordinate to the muscle man in the center.

One man interpreted the sketch as a message about race. “Clearly both figures are of mixed race,” said Stanley Ipkiss. “Alex has a white body and a black head, while Kan obviously has a black body and a white head.”

Ipcus added that the figures seemed to symbolize repressed and deep-seeded characteristics that those of mixed race may feel.

Others interpreted the art differently.

“I think it’s unique,” said staff member Fletcher Reede. “Obviously the figure ‘Alex’ has worked hard to achieve his status and others are eager to please him. I mean, look, the other person is saying ‘I can. I think it just shows how dedicated others are to those that are better than them.”

Many commented that the piece would have sent a stronger message had it been painted on canvas or perhaps sculpted in bronze.“Attention is immediately drawn to Alex’s face. Just look at the emotion in his eyes. He is obviously concerned about his position and can’t even make eye contact with Kan,” art student Charlie Baileygates said. Another art student, Hank Evans, disagreed strongly saying that he often felt like the man that Alex portrays in the figure; Evans suggested that more men act like Alex and less like Kan, saying, “They are just two sides of the same man. Don’t be that little man.”

Despite disagreement over the intentions of the artist, it is clear that there were many art faux pas while this sketch was created. Regarding the sketching of bodies, it seems that the artist paid little attention to the neck, an important feature of the human anatomy. Many wondered how Alex had managed to build up 20 muscles in his body without making his skinny neck any stronger.

Kan, despite the clear lack of muscles, does not seem to have a neck at all. Unfortunately, before any other judgments could be made about it, the cable guy, who had to work on the wiring in the room, came in and erased the art.

All criticism aside, “what bitch” clearly caused some compelling commentary during its short-lived appearance in the GLC.

Posted by dwright at March 28, 2006 12:36 PM

Comments

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?