« Under the covers...with Nick Bell | Main | Strong seniors help out as Pipers look to improve last season's lackluster ranking »

February 07, 2006

Brokebackmania

Columnist

Lately it seems that you can’t turn on the TV, open a magazine, or browse the Internet with out hearing about Brokeback Mountain. From a short story about sheepherders with a secret, to a critically acclaimed film culminated in a full out media frenzy over gay cowboys, Brokeback has had quite a ride. Now the public is left with an overwhelming amount of information, countless news stories, criticisms and praises for a film that has just barely made $50 million at the box office. In the end it leaves the movie-going audience with mixed messages and confused ideas as to what the movie is and how they should feel about it. So a brief history lesson is in order.

Brokeback Mountain is a short story written by Annie Proulx. The short story was originally published by “The New Yorker” in 1997 and tells of an elicit love affair between two male sheepherders. The story opens with Jack and Ennis both looking for work in the summer of 1963. They find work guarding a flock of sheep on Brokeback Mountain in Wyoming. They are to spend the summer alone on the mountain, and their only contact with the rest of the world is a weekly supply delivery from their employer. Everything goes well and the two begin to bond, but one night, thanks to a bit of whiskey, things go a bit further.

The two begin to share a secret relationship that neither is fully able to deal with. At the summers end, they have to leave Brokeback Mountain and both go their separate ways. Four years later both have married and started families, but their bond was far from broken. Jack sends Ennis a note and the two begin a twenty year affair of secret meetings disguised as fishing trips. The affair has serious consequences for both of the men and their families, but it is the power of their unspoken love that keeps bringing them together.

The story was published and became a rather big success, at least as far as short stories go. In time it caught the interest of screen writers Larry McMurtry and Diana Ossana who teamed up with director Ang Lee to make it a movie.

Eventually they found willing backers and actors and now the stage is set for Oscar glory. So, the only question remaining is: is it all worth the effort and attention?

To that I would answer a resounding yes. The film is nearly flawless with beautiful cinematography, pitch perfect music and brilliant performances. Heath Ledger stars as Ennis and has, with one performance, redefined his career from forgotten teen star to award-winning actor. The rest of the cast is worthy of all the praise they have been given, especially Michelle Williams who has little screen time but uses it to create one of the most heart-wrenching and powerful performances in recent memory. To her credit she earned an Oscar nomination for best supporting actress the same day that her “Dawson’s Creek” co-star and “rival” Katie Holmes earned a nomination for worst supporting actress for Batman Begins (though Ms. Holmes nomination is only backlash against her being an unabashed attention whore).

Most important in dealing with this difficult and moving film is the way it has been received by audiences. It has spurned the usual protests, criticisms, and outrage of every major motion picture with gay characters in leading roles. The difference here is that even the staunchest GLBTI advocates cannot fully defend the actions of the main characters that both lie to and cheat on their wives for twenty years.

However, any rational person who has actually seen the movie can easily ascertain that the film doesn’t attempt to justify their actions, but simply shows the enduring power of love against impossible odds. This has lead to tales of viewers going back six, seven even eight times to see the movie. Audiences describe it as haunting because this film takes time to fully sink in. The story itself is very much a gay romance, but the deepest themes of the movie are more universal and affect gay and straight viewers alike. I would suggest to anybody who thinks they might be interested in the film, go see it despite any stigma of watching a “gay cowboy love story.” Just remember to bring some Kleenex.

Posted by dwright at February 7, 2006 12:02 AM

Comments

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?