« *Letter to the Editor* Please don’t befriend me, Mr. President | Main | *Letter to the Editor* The role of campus security »
October 19, 2004
*Letter to the Editor* Suburban terrorism
April 19, 1995. Do you remember where you were? How about April 20, 1999? Between these two events, 200 people perished.
One was the Oklahoma City bombing, and the other the Columbine shootings in Littleton, Colo. Homeland security didn’t become a standard of safety until after the turn of the century.
As we focus on a certain group of people, whether it’s Al-Qaeda or Iraqis, we forget one of the most important contributors to terrorism, an axis of evil in its own right that stems from within this country’s foundation of the “American dream.” We forget about suburban white America.
My last article focused on the issues facing immigrants in the United States. Since it has been brought to my attention that immigrants pose an imminent threat to national security, I thought it necessary to present the full picture.
Not that I disagree with the argument, but, as was stated in Carly Schaps’ Oct. 12 letter to the editor, “news is when a person reports facts that he or she observes in a nonbiased way.” To offer a fair representation of the threats facing people within our country today, it is important to view all sides and also to realize that our country is not immune to committing acts of terrorism simply because our agenda is to rid the world of it.
In the last decade, we’ve seen a wave of violence occurring within small communities all over the United
States. Over 100 people have been killed or wounded as a result of these malicious attacks. Most have been committed by a person who, by social standards, would be categorized as white or Caucasian. All have occurred in small-town communities.
I personally have seen what Sept. 11 has done for people of color in the United States. Since the attacks, I have been pulled over four times, and only once was there actual cause to do so.
There hasn’t been a backlash against the “white” terrorists who carried out attacks against Americans because somehow they are not viewed as threats. However, when the attacks are committed by a person of color, suddenly the turban, dark skin, beards, and heavy accents become early warning signals.
Take the time to look at airport security checkpoints and watch who is being pulled over to the side to be checked just one more time. None match the description of Timothy McVeigh, Kip Kinkel, Michael Carneal, Luke Woodham, Dylan Klebold, or Eric Harris.
The United States homeland terrorist network is alive and well only because the public at large is too busy looking for weapons of mass “distraction” in other countries when the real battle is happening on the home front.
We lash out at immigrants for coming to our country because, as Schaps stated regarding my mother, “she was not invited here and the government did not say she could live here.” Sorry we didn’t get the invitation.
However, an American-backed government army pushed my mother’s home country of El Salvador into a 10-year civil war that left 70,000 dead and 30,000 more missing at the hands of U.S.- aided death squads. The invitation came in the form of bombs, bullets, and death threats, and this applies not only to my mother but also to all immigrants.
Thousands of Iraqis, mostly children, have died of starvation after more than a decade of a U.S. embargo, when we refused to provide any form of humanitarian aid because of a personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein. Sept. 11 produced 3,000 dead, and by no means is that a small number. One person dead at the hands of terrorism is too much, but for decades the United States has funded terrorist attacks throughout Latin America, the Middle East, and even on our own soil.
I have stated facts and evidence of the terrorism caused by Caucasian people within this country. Obviously, “suburban terrorism” will never be the topic of conversation on The O’Reilly Factor or of an hourlong special on CNN. But the hard work that my mother and thousands of immigrants put forth every day without benefits or bonuses while at the same time still paying taxes makes them more than worthy of being in the United States.
Schaps says her ancestors were worthy of entering this country. Who gave them authority to deem themselves worthy of this soil when it clearly was not discovered by Columbus and had been inhabited by indigenous people of the Americas well before the 1800s?
The threat is not in Afghanistan, Iraq, or North Korea. The threat is within our country and the terrorists are not Arab, Latino, Hmong, or Black. They are the John Walker Lindhs (a.k.a. the “American Taliban”) and others who grow up in our educational system and attend schools that hope to make them into “compassionate citizens of the world.”
Esteban Renderos
NCORE Network
Posted by msveum at October 19, 2004 11:39 AM
Comments
This letter is a response by nine white students to Schaps’ article (Oct. 12). It was not printed in this week’s oracle because of space considerations, but it will appear in a subsequent issue…
Ningun ser humano es ilegal: No human being is illegal
We feel a responsibility to respond to arguments made by Schaps (Oct. 12) that perpetuate racist and historically inaccurate sentiment towards Latinos. Referring to someone as an “Illegal immigrant” or as “an illegal” is dehumanizing because it reduces one’s identity to U.S. imposed values of economic and legal importance.
Schaps claimed that Renderos’s article was biased and therefore un-newsworthy, but we ask what makes her perspective more objective? What makes her “American” family history more legitimate than that of Renderos? Is it because those in power “legally welcomed” her ancestors? History has shown that what is “legal” can also be racist, and immigration law is no exception.
Immigration law has always been economically and racially motivated. Immigration restrictions in the 1920’s mandated that, “No African country could send more than 100 people, 100 was the limit for China, for Bulgaria, for Palestine; 34,007 could come from England…51,227 from Germany, but only 124 from Lithuania; 28,567 from the Irish Free State...” (373, Zinn)
In addition, immigrants of color have faced the Chinese Exclusion Act, Japanese Internment Camps, and the Bracero Program, which is similar to a current Bush proposal that prevents immigrant workers from becoming full citizens. Today, Latin Americans are losing jobs due to NAFTA and other exploitative free trade agreements. The violence and injustice of U.S. capitalism forces the dispossessed to immigrate.
Latinos face widespread discrimination within the U.S. If Governor Pawlenty’s proposal passes and police are allowed to ask about immigration status and license display status, Latinos will inevitably be targeted and interrogated disproportionately. According to the Minnestoa Institute on Race and Poverty’s statewide racial profiling research, “The combined stop rate for Latinos was 170% greater than expected…Only 9% of searches of Latinos produced contraband compared to 13% of searches of whites. In absolute terms officers stopped 640 more Latinos than they would have if Latinos had been stopped at the same rate as all drivers.”
Schaps seems to place immigrants in two categories: 1) potential terrorist, or 2) economic “free-riders”. These assumptions deny the contributions that immigrants make to culture, society, and economic sustainability. Hamline’s culture would significantly suffer without the contribution of students of color and international students. Our education, which has been based on white accounts of “truth”, systematically denies the experiences of people of color.
Lastly, we do not believe that terrorism can be stopped by unjust immigration restrictions. It is incorrect to assume that because the September 11 attackers were undocumented, that only undocumented people are capable of terrorism. We don’t have to look far into U.S. history to find examples of terrorism by white “documented” citizens: the shootings at Columbine High School and the bombings in Oklahoma City. We believe that security is fostered by creating justice, and the greatest threat to justice today is the U.S. legacy of racist policies.
To further your learning, we recommend classes such as: Nurith Zmora’s “Ethnicity, Class, and Gender,” and Janet Carlson’s “The Asian-American Experience.”
Katy Blank
Maria Bujold
Susan Erickson
Krystal Klein
Megan Kohls
Shannon Malone
Colin Schumacher
Matt Thiede
Laura Wilson
Posted by: Colin Schumacher at October 20, 2004 04:48 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)