Slavery and Human Trafficking in Modern Mexico

Kari Michaelis

 

Slavery: for thousands of years this word has conjured up haunting and horrific images. Today when one thinks of slavery, his mind often travels back to the 1800s U.S. South. Many even forget that slavery still exists. Modern slavery, however, is just as brutal as historic slavery. Best defined as the complete domination humans have over other humans through forced labor, illegal bondage, sale, exploitation, and sexual exploitation, modern slavery involves deception, coercion, and violence. Human trafficking is generally regarded as a euphemism for modern-day slave trading. According to the U.S. State Department, “annually, at least 600,000 to 800,000 people, mostly women and children, are trafficked across borders worldwide(Trafficking in Persons Report, 2004). Such numbers are staggering, especially considering they do not include victims trafficked within their own countries. Human trafficking, also known as trafficking in persons, is defined as

the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring or receipt of a person by means of the threat or use of force or other means of coercion, or by abduction, fraud, deception, abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability, or by the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation (“Legal Building Blocks to Combat Trafficking in Persons,February 2004).

This modern-day form of slave trading has planted its roots in almost every continent on earth, including North America, and has become the second largest criminal enterprise (tied with arms dealing) behind drug trafficking (Pioneer Press, April 4, 2005). A form of natal alienation, human trafficking strips victims of their legal rights, and detaches them from any legitimate social order (Patterson, Orlando 5). One country where human trafficking has been a lingering presence is Mexico. Today, trafficking contributes to the three main types of slavery in Mexico, and is kept alive by a multitude of factors; although the United States and Mexican governments, as well as individual citizens, are attempting to put an end to this horrific practice, continued corruption makes it a very daunting task.                                

Human trafficking in Mexico has been a prevalent issue for decades. Because no national anti-trafficking laws exist, a comprehensive approach to deal with trafficking has not been established (Trafficking in Persons Interim Assessment, 2005). The Mexican government, responsible for ensuring the rights of its people, has more often than not turned a blind eye to the abuse and corruption plaguing its streets. Such corruption, often in the form of police officers and other authority figures, severely limits a trafficking victim’s resources. By participating in or condoning trafficking and exploitation, these seemingly trustworthy people do more harm than good. Also plaguing the Mexican government is the weakness of the public defense system. The legal system, best described as a “thicket” by Jose Luis Soberanes, former director of the Institute of Legal Studies at Mexico’s National Autonomous University, is not equipped to handle thousands of kidnapping and murder cases each year. Although each of Mexico’s 31 states has its own judicial system, and the federal government prosecutes federal crimes (Human Rights Watch, Systemic 32), the courts do not know how to decide human rights issues because of the vagueness of the national law (Human Rights Watch, Systemic 8).

The internal problems of the Mexican government are not the only factors that contribute to the continued presence of human trafficking. According to David Shirk and Alexandra Webber, authors of “Slavery Without Borders: Human Trafficking in the U.S.-Mexican Context,” “the underlying causes of human trafficking are related to major trends in the new global economy” (Shirk and Webber 8). The increased flow of goods, people, and capital, as well as ever-expanding socioeconomic inequalities have left nearly 40 percent of Mexico’s population in poverty and susceptible to trafficking. Because of such economic disparities, much of Mexico’s trafficking problem is internal. It has been estimated that “16,000 to 20,000 Mexican and Central American children [are subjected to sexual exploitation] in the border, urban, and tourist areas of Mexico [alone]” (Trafficking in Persons Interim Assessment, 2005). The pervasiveness of organized crime is also the cause of much concern (Shirk and Webber 8-11). Two final factors that contribute to Mexico’s trafficking epidemic include major demographic shifts in migrant populations and technological innovations such as the Internet. Web-based sex tourism promotions and file-sharing of pornographic materials have added to Mexico’s reputation as an “exotic destination for erotic vacations and sex tourism” (Shirk and Webber 11).    Supported by the trafficking industry, sex tourism, forced labor, and sexual exploitation are the main forms of slavery in Mexico today. Slavery in modern Mexico is extrusive. Once victims escape or are set free by their captors because they are no longer socially acceptable, they literally have nowhere to turn. If they go to the police they are often brushed aside, and if they go back to their families, they are dismissed. They  become an outsider because [they] no longer belong [anywhere]” (Patterson, Orlando 44). In the simplest sense, they become victims for life. At the outset, “some are baited by promises of legitimate jobs and a better life...[many are] abducted; others are bought from or abandoned by their impoverished families” (Landesman, Peter 2). Whatever the case may be, “deception and/or coercion” is always involved on the half of the traffickers. “In many cases, [they] obtain and maintain control of a victim through the guise of debt bondage” (Shirk and Webber 2).

Debt bondage is most commonly used in instances of forced labor. According to Title 18, Section 1589 of the United States Code, forced labor is defined as

knowingly providing or obtaining the labor or services of a person] (1) by threats of serious harm to, or physical restraint against, that person or another person; (2) by means of any scheme, plan, or pattern intended to cause the person to believe that, if the person did not perform such labor or services, that person or another person would suffer serious harm or physical restraint; or (3) by means of the abuse or threatened abuse of law or the legal process (18 U.S.C. Section 1589 (2004)).

Broke, unable to pay back loans, and lured away from home by the promise of better wages and labor conditions, many Mexican and Central American agricultural workers find themselves enslaved through debt bondage and forced labor, although both are specifically prohibited by the International Labor Organization Convention No. 105. Slaves of the forced labor system work long hours under hazardous conditions, and if they do not perform up to the expectations of their overseers, they are subjected to severe punishments, then forced to return to work. Because a large portion of forced laborers are undocumented immigrants illegally trafficked into the United States, they lack marketable skills, are ignorant of their rights, and are afraid of recapture, so they do not attempt to escape (Human Rights Watch, Indivisible 62). Slaves of forced labor are also threatened with violence on their families. Although overseers usually have no knowledge of the family’s whereabouts, constant threats are enough to deter any action the slave may take.

        One horrific example of forced labor was reported in the New York Times: in  June 2002, “40 farm laborers [were] forced into indentured servitude in Albion, New York; this following the infamous case of dozens of deaf Mexicans trafficked and exploited as panhandlers in New York City in 1997" (Shirk and Webber 3). Reliable estimates on the number of exploited laborers in Mexico today do not exist because forced labor is a “convenient” form of modern-day slavery, as it is often undetectable. Because living conditions in many parts of the country are so poor, the plight of an enslaved fieldhand working 18 hour shifts simply goes unnoticed.

The second form of slavery in Mexico also goes largely unnoticed by the public eye. Sexual exploitation, or sexual slavery, is defined as “keeping a person in a state of sexual servitude [or] engaging in any other form of commercial sexual exploitation, including but not limited to pimping, pandering, procuring, profiting from prostitution, maintaining a brothel, [and] child pornography” (“Legal Building Blocks to Combat Trafficking in Persons,” February 2004). Sexual slavery is a major concern for Mexico, as it not only occurs through trafficking slaves into the U.S., but also domestically. As is the case with forced labor, these victims are deceived by promises of better jobs and a better life. They are then trafficked into the United States or kept in filthy Mexican brothels, hidden away from the outside world. “Because of the porousness of the U.S.-Mexican border and the criminal networks that traverse it, the towns and cities along the border have become the main staging area in [this] industry” (Landesman 1). Victims of sexual exploitation are found in Mexican prisons as well. Because of massive overcrowding and corruption in the prison system, minors are sometimes housed with adults, leading them to be used as sex slaves by the other inmates. Bribery also plays a part in such exploitation and is generally accepted as an inevitable part of prison life (Americas Watch, Prison).

Minors in the prison system are not the only children exposed to the horrors of sex slavery. According to UNICEF, “an estimated 16,000 children in Mexico are exploited in [commercial sexual exploitation], with tourist destinations being among those areas with the highest number” (www.unicef.org/protection/files/sexex2.pdf 1). The exact number of men, women, and children forced into sexual exploitation is unknown, however, due to the psychological, emotional, and physical damage of the victims. Most are too afraid to testify against their former captors, so sexual traffickers and prostitution ringleaders remain at large. Such was the case in 2002, when authorities uncovered a San Diego–based prostitution ring. Here, “hundreds of men [were brought] to have sex with 30 women and girls at $15 to $20 per visit; nearly half of the women were minors and the youngest estimated to be aged 12" (Shirk and Webber 4). Because only one of the women was willing to testify in court, however, the traffickers were never prosecuted. Silence on the part of the victim is not unusual, as government data has indicated. From 2003 to 2004, only “27 arrests [were] made and 16 additional arrest warrants issued for sexual exploitation trafficking offenses” (Trafficking in Persons Interim Assessment, 2005).

Although there are many links between sexual exploitation and prostitution, there are also distinguishing elements. The main element is that victims of sexual exploitation are not “working for profit or a paycheck. They [are] captives to the traffickers and keepers who [control] their every move” (Landesman 1). What does link them together is the fact that “where prostitution is legalized or tolerated, there is a greater demand for human trafficking victims and nearly always an increase in the number of women and children trafficked into commercial sex slavery” (“Link Between Prostitution and Sex Trafficking” 1). Although prostitution has not been legalized in Mexico, it is certainly tolerated. Such tolerance is not only mentally and emotionally damaging on the victim, but physically damaging as well, as the risk of infection and fatal diseases such as HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, and cervical cancer increase dramatically in the sexually exploited.

Equally as damaging to its victims is the third form of Mexican slavery: sex tourism. Sex tourism, defined as “the act of traveling to another country to engage in commercial sex, usually due to greater tolerance (or legality) in the destination country” (Shirk and Webber 5), often involves children. Sex tourism in Mexico is fueled by American and Canadian tourists, and has been growing since Asia enacted a tougher crackdown on such practices in 2001. To provide for the growing demand in sex tourism, children are taken from their homes or street corners and put up in hotels and orphanages. Tourists access the information for such destinations on the Internet, then book rooms accordingly.

One tourist area frequented by sexual exploiters is Tijuana’s “Tolerance Zone,”a maze of dark alleys and seedy bars. Although it is located just blocks from popular nightclubs, few know of its existence. Prostitution is legal in the “Zone,” and children are often found wandering the streets in search of “survival sex” (sex that pays just enough money to get through the day). These children then allow themselves to be brought into the U.S. and used by traffickers and sex tourists because they believe the money they earn will go to their impoverished families at home. Traffickers themselves take the risk of crossing the border because the children are more profitable in the U.S. (Tijuana Tragedy). Another part of Mexico frequented by sexual tourists is Puerto Vallarta, and multimillionaire Thomas Frank White, age 67, of San Francisco is just one example. Mr. White was arrested in February 2003 “for sexual exploitation of minors, including child prostitution, child sexual abuse, and providing drugs to minors in an orphanage that he co-founded” (Shirk and Webber 6). Although many orphanages have now been established in Mexico to shelter former child slaves, corruption, as in the case of Thomas Frank White, is still an all too frequent occurrence.

Orphanages are just one of the many ways the Mexican government is trying to put an end to human trafficking and slavery. Tijuana, for example, is home to a shelter for sexually abused boys. At the shelter the boys are given counseling and an education so they can “have a second chance at childhood.” A similar shelter is run by Sister Doris, a former California Socialite, who uses money from her savings to house 16 children and pay tuition for them to attend school. Sister Doris has hopes of opening a larger center that will house 80 to 100 children in the future (Tijuana Tragedy).     

Besides orphanages and shelters, the government has announced the creation of a National Center Against Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children and a comprehensive anti-trafficking bill. Mexican officials are also speaking out against trafficking and cooperating with U.S. NGOs (Non-governmental organizations) in the hope of detaining trafficking victims before they cross the border. The U.S.-Mexican border is approximately 2,000 miles long, however, so the system is still vulnerable to the manipulation of experienced traffickers. Mexico is also “in the preliminary stages of implementing a program, as part of the March 2004 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Guatemala, in which non-work visas will be issued to trafficking victims willing to participate in prosecutions against traffickers. Mexico [also] signed an MOU with the Organization of American States that will allow for an assessment of trafficking in persons and prevention mechanisms” (Trafficking in Persons Interim Assessment, 2005). The Human Rights Watch, established in 1978 to conduct investigations of human rights abuses around the world, believes that the Mexican government must adopt a strict and aggressive strategy when dealing with human rights violations and allegations of abuse, and stop turning a blind eye to corruption (Human Rights Watch Implausible, 9-15). We have not seen this aggressive strategy to date, however, as Mexico is still relying on existing laws to prosecute traffickers, instead of writing new ones. Although the criminal code includes penalties against forced prostitution, maintaining brothels, and infecting others with venereal diseases, “pimping and child exploitation are practiced widely without arrest or prosecution, and often with the collaboration or knowledge of corrupt or apathetic local law enforcement officials” (Shirk and Webber 15-16). The penal code has not been reformed either, except for a few laws that have strengthened the penalty for sexually exploiting minors.

Because the Mexican government does not fully comply with the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking, it was placed on the Tier Two Watch List  of the 2005 U.S. Trafficking in Persons (TIP) Interim Assessment. The Assessment stresses the need for a national-level commitment to fight trafficking and further cooperation in identifying trafficking across the U.S. and Guatemalan borders. The Assessment also draws attention to the “Three P’s in Trafficking Elimination: Prosecution, Protection, and Prevention.” To conform with the Three P’s, Mexico must cooperate in the “prevention of trafficking through such efforts as publicity of the threat and a shared commitment to fight it; protection of victims, including rescue and rehabilitation; and prosecution of perpetrators” (“Ending Child Sex Tourism: Fighting Trafficking in Persons,” 2004). Mexico must also increase its number of trafficking convictions, establish a national approach that protects victims, continue operating its trafficking victims hotline and awareness campaigns, and adopt a new deportation policy that will allow detainees to be investigated before being deported (Trafficking in Persons Interim Assessment, 2005).

Along with publishing annual TIP Reports, the United States government works vigorously to stop trafficking in other countries and at home. Because of the proximity of Mexico, the U.S. pays particular attention to its anti-trafficking progress and compliance with the Three P’s. Although the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, a branch of the U.S. State Department, handles most trafficking issues, other government agencies such as the President’s Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, the Office of Citizenship and Immigration Services (formerly INS), and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Bureau (ICE) also contribute to the fight. For its contribution, ICE operates a trafficking victims hotline (1-866-DHS-2ICE), along with the Department of Justice (1-888-428-7581), and the Department of Health and Human Services (1-888-373-7888) (Trafficking in Persons Report, 2004). The Department of Health and Human Services also issued a new campaign on April 6, 2005 to “educate Americans about the [trafficking] enterprise, offer outreach and training to social service organizations, local law enforcement, and health care professionals, and raise awareness about and combat trafficking” (Pioneer Press, April 4, 2005).

Congress has taken aggressive strides in the fight against trafficking as well. In 2000, the Trafficking Victims Protection Act was passed. The Act laid out the “minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking in persons,” including, witness protection, sentencing guidelines, victim immunity, and victim outreach. Reauthorized in 2003, the Act enhanced the State Department’s ability to report efforts against slavery and trafficking (Trafficking Victims


Protection Reauthorization Act, 2003). The PROTECT Act (Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to End the Exploitation of Children Today) was also established in 2003 to “give U.S.  authorities better tools to combat international sex tourism and the commercial sexual exploitation of children, as well as domestic federal offenses of child abuse, child kidnapping, and child torture”  (Trafficking in Persons Report, 2004). The Act allows law enforcement officers to prosecute Americans who travel abroad and sexually abuse minors, without having to prove prior intent to commit illicit crimes, and strengthens the punishment for convicted child sex tourists. Other U.S. government steps to eliminate trafficking include Operation Predator (an initiative to identify, investigate, and arrest child sex criminals, including traffickers), providing $295 million over the past five years to countries struggling to end trafficking, and giving $168,750 to Mexico’s International Trafficking of Women and Children for Sexual Exploitation in the Americas Program (“U.S. Government’s International Anti-Trafficking Programs,” 2004).

Although it is a start, government programming is not the only way to eliminate trafficking. Through outreach and awareness programs, U.S. citizens can also make a difference. The State Department has issued the following anti-trafficking recommendations to U.S. citizens: “increase public awareness about modern-day slavery, support groups that work to end human trafficking, ask state legislators and representatives to pass anti-trafficking in persons laws, understand the link between human trafficking and commercial, sexual exploitation, and report suspected human trafficking cases” (“Citizen Action,” August 9, 2004). The State Department has also created a “How Can I Recognize Trafficking Victims” Fact Sheet on their website. This site allows people to research profiles, health characteristics, visible indicators, and signs of trafficking victims, and can be accessed at http://www.state.gov/g/tip/rls/fs/34563.htm.


Although human trafficking and modern-day slavery are still critical problems in Mexico, as well as the U.S., there is hope for the future. President Bush has named the elimination of

      trafficking one of his top priorities for the new term, and former Secretary of State Colin Powell believes human integrity will help conquer the enormous task at hand. In an Op-Ed piece for the New York Times, Powell stated the reason for his optimism: “The more you learn about how the most innocent and vulnerable among us are savaged by these crimes,” he wrote, “the more impossible it becomes to look the other way” (International Herald Tribune, June 14, 2004). Powell, like many other Americans, believes that the underlying good of human nature can eventually defeat the beast of human trafficking. This underlying good is a passion for justice and equality that burns deep in the hearts of millions. Although the fight against human trafficking and slavery has been raging for millennia, this time around things are different. This time the fight is not just for the victims and potential victims; this time the fight is also for ourselves. This time we have finally realized that not until we defend the dignity of others, can we truly embrace our own dignity as human beings (International Herald Tribune, June 14, 2004).


Bibliography

Americas Watch Report. Brutality Unchecked: Human Rights Abuses Along the U.S. Border         with Mexico. New York: Human Rights Watch, 1992.   

 

Americas Watch Report. Prison Conditions in Mexico. New York: Human Rights Watch, 1991.

 

“Fact Sheet: Commercial Sexual Exploitation.” <www.unicef.org/protection/files/sexex2.pdf1>.

 

“Forced Labor.” 18 U.S.C. § 1589 (2004).

 

Human Rights Watch. Implausible Deniability: State Responsibility for Rural Violence in         Mexico. New York: Human Rights Watch, 1997.

 

Human Rights Watch. Indivisible Human Rights: The Relationship of Political and Civil Rights         to Survival, Subsistence and Poverty. New York: Human Rights Watch, 1992.

 

Human Rights Watch. Systemic Injustice: Torture, “Disappearance,” and Extrajudicial Execution in Mexico. New York: Human Rights Watch, 1999.

 

Landesman, Peter. “The Girls Next Door.” New York Times 25 January 2004: sec.2 30.

 

Patterson, Orlando. Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study. Massachusetts: Harvard                   University Press, 1982.

 

Powell, Colin L. “Our Trafficking Signal: Stop!” International Herald Tribune 14 June 2004.

 

“Program Takes Aim at Human Trafficking.” St. Paul Pioneer Press 4 April 2005: B1.

 

Shirk, David, and Alexandra Webber. “Slavery Without Borders: Human Trafficking in the U.S.-             Mexican Context.” Hemisphere Focus 12.5 (23 January 2004).

 

Tijuana Tragedy. Narr. Thelma Gutierrez. Live From. CNN. 9 March 2005.

 

Trafficking Victims Protection Act, Pub. L. No. 106-386, § 108, 114 Stat. 1464-1548 (2000).

 

Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, H.R. 2620, 108th Cong. (Jan. 7, 2003).

 

United States. Department of State. “Citizen Action: How Can I Help End Modern-Day                             Slavery?” Washington, D.C.: Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons,                        August 9, 2004.

United States. Department of State.Ending Child Sex Tourism: Fighting Trafficking in                             Persons.” Washington, DC: Bureau of Public Affairs, September 2, 2004.


United States. Department of State. “How Can I Recognize Trafficking Victims” Fact Sheet.         <http://www.state.gov/g/tip/rls/fs/34563.htm>.

 

United States. Department of State.Legal Building Blocks to Combat Trafficking in Persons.”

Washington, D.C.: Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, February 2004.

 

United States. Department of State. “The Link Between Prostitution and Sex Trafficking.”                        Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Public Affairs, November 24, 2004.

United States. Department of State. Trafficking in Persons Interim Assessment 2005.                                 Washington, D.C.: Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, January 3, 2005.

 

United States. Department of State. Trafficking in Persons Report 2004. Washington, D.C.:                      Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, June 14, 2004.

 

United States. Department of State. “The U.S. Government’s International Anti-Trafficking       

           Programs.” Washington, D.C.: Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, July 7, 2004.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14